From: eric@flesch.org (Eric Flesch) Subject: Gravity *is* Acceleration [Hyperstar Cosmology] Date: 1998/10/06 Message-ID: <361da0d3.13383370@news.nn.iconz.co.nz>#1/1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Internet Company of New Zealand Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro General Relativity was founded upon the tenet of the Equivalence Principle, which holds the dynamics of gravity to be identical to the dynamics of acceleration. Here I show the Strongest Equivalence Princple, which is that gravity *is* acceleration, specifically, the acceleration of the expanding universe. The picture is often painted of our 3-D manifold being the surface of some 4-D sphere. In such a picture the sphere would expand hyperradially (i.e. along a 4th spatial dimension), causing the surface area (our universe) to expand. While I entertained this model, certain observational constraints (the inverse angular-size-to-redshift relationship) and mathematical constraints (the non-viability of 4-D space) require a fifth dimension. Thus our 4-dimensional space-time manifold defines a kind of surface on a 5-D hypersphere. This hypersphere is no dead artifact, but an essential and dynamic contributor to our total universal picture. And this hypersphere is expanding. And accelerating its expansion. Now, this isn't exactly spatial expansion in the 3-D sense, as the fifth dimension is not spatial. Instead it is reminiscent of a 2nd dimension of time, or more precisely, inverse time (details in the next posting). The observational consequence of this expansion is that time is seen to speed up with the aeons. Judging by the time to z=1 (50% redshift), the period of time doubling is about 6*10^9 years. Note that the latest measurement of supernova light curves show that the universe is *accelerating* its expansion. This piece of the puzzle has made this model possible. Note that variable time flow is a normal part of GR. Time flows more slowly, say, in the presence of gravitational forces, i.e. lower an atomic clock to the surface of a neutron star (let's assume it's very well-built), and when you pull it back up you will see it ran slowly there. The time flow is slower there. So differential rate of time flow is an established fact of our universe. Therefore, the established principle of time dilation is all that's needed to explain the cosmological redshift. Given the expansion of the hyperstar, and the consequential speedup of time flow through the aeons, the cosmological redshift is entirely explained in that time simply ran slower in earlier days. There is no need for an additional requirement of spatial expansion -- indeed, Occam's Razor rules it out. And gravity? Note that the hyperradial expansion of the hyperstar is resisted *inertially* by matter. But the matter is pushed. And as a sailing boat which tacks to the wind, so does the inertial resistance of matter entail a resultant normal component to the 5-D force, normal into the 3-D geometry. This normal force is gravity. Gravity is simply *the 3-D component of the the hperradial acceleration of the expanding universe*. The more massive the matter, the more strongly it inertially resists the hyperradial acceleration, the stronger the 3-D projection of the forces, the stronger is the gravity. This is why the theoriests cannot unify gravity with the other fundamental forces. Gravity comes from outside our universe! And the hyperstar model of the universe shows that not only is gravity *equivalent* to acceleration, as Einstein observed, but that gravity actually *is* acceleration, the acceleration of the expanding universe. It's kind of odd that the Standard model should hold that the universe is expanding, and yet that we should somehow be oblivious to this most fundamental of universal building blocks. Here it is seen that in fact we feel this universal expansion every second of our lives. Eric Flesch Nelson, New Zealand 7 October 1998